![]() Only for the volunteers of the expedition to study the spectral effects of light on plants ,at Mars ? MIT scientists suggest to MARS ONE expedition ,875 units of a $ 6 562 500 budget and 612,5 KW power , ![]() Looking forward for a Heliospectra grow thread.Ĭlick to expand.I've to admit that we're on the same wave,here. Īny gordian knot is untied by just a single sword slash. "Straight-forward approach " ,is written in my DNA,all over. Then,the next generation of my DIY lights will be boasting ,every available monochrome LED ![]() If it does not fail and manages to live up to it's myth. I've made enough already ,since I've became an active member of this forum. Ĭause it's 700 Watts of monochromatic leds. That's why I want to see that LED light in action. Ĭan this light compete or even excel against our humble COBs ?ĭo you want my honest opinion ,or at least a hard guess on that one ?īut then I might be totally wrong about it. What I want to see is ,if that fixture is worth of it's price and if the monochrome diodes combination it boasts ,Ĭan really deliver higher quantity and quality of herb ,than the blue diodes + phosphor doped LES of COBs can. ( Especially if one spends $7500 to build a super efficient COB light. More or less ,most of us know pretty well what 700 W of COBS can do. I'd prefer to see a complete grow from start till end ,with a single fixture. Review of the light is rendered rather obsolete for me. MIT guys ,are pretty much more informed on the subject than we are. Īdd to that the thermally efficient blue diodes under the LES of CXB 3590 ,and not green,amber, red & FR thermally sensitive monochrome LED diodes. While still for $ 6.5 ml budget ,total power would have been well above 612,5 KWatts. Utilising CXB 3590 ,driven really low ,the efficiency would 've been well above 50% , Then,again I 'm assuming ,that the budget for 875 units ( $ 6 562 500 ) of LED lights ,is rather high ,even for NASA ,when with the same budget they could have more efficient LED lights and probably much more wattage than 612,5 KWatts. Ĭlick to seriously doubt that the personel of MARS ONE expedition ,will have to pay for electricity. Still ,I'm eager to see if a single $7500 / 700 W L4A unit can grow same or superior quantity and quality of herb, than a 700 W DIY COB light fixture ,as most of us ain't going to travel to Mars ,to grow lettuce and who knows what else. Please ,satisfy the thirst for this particular knowledge. Still ,I'm eager to see if a single $7500 / 700 W L4A unit can grow same or superior quantity and quality of herb, than a 700 W / ~$1000 DIY COB light fixture ,as most of us ain't going to travel to Mars ,to grow lettuce and who knows what else. I 'm just assuming ,that using ~$33000 of COBS per square meter ,they might have had greater results than. Still ,MIT guys ,for sure, they are aware of things ,I surely do not know or can't even think of. Īnd that is considered as "minimisation of power use " ?. (GLS) to minimize power use, and assume that it will be similar to the Heliospectra L4A Series growth light Ī current state-of-the-art commercially available option.Ĩ75 LED units are required to provide full coverage ofĨ75/200 = 4,375 L4A units per square meter We assume the use of LED lights in the Growth Lighting System (MIT scientists suggest that the mission will fail and eventually all the volunteers might/will face serious trouble and eventually death within less than a year or so ,if I remember correctly. ![]() Where they express their-pretty serious- doubts & concerns about the success of whole mission. The binding's Monolink Technology 1.0 keeps the Helio 200's ultralight, consisting of a spring-less toe arm on one side, which as a result creates a higher clamping stiffness in-turn providing a secure connection when clicking in for a rip downhill.I've just remembered a MIT report ,about the MARS ONE expedition , These bindings are crafted from aircraft grade aluminum and stainless-steel and utilize an optimized toe geometry for easy boot step-in while remaining extremely reactive and powerful. If you dream of turning on the afterburners but aren't willing to bog down your set-up on the skin-track, this beauty is right up your alley.Įngineered to provide security and power while ripping big mountain lines, yet light enough to handle massive vertical days, the Helio 200 LT remains dedicated safety and performance. Ultralight with a more precise release, the Helio 200 LT is the ultimate backcountry touring binding for the seasoned skier targeting fast ascents or long days in the mountains. Building on the success of their beloved Helio 200 binding, the Helio 200 LT provides safety and performance while remaining stripped down, bringing the binding to an absolutely bonkers 167g.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |